Optimizing harvest timing: Impacts on physical characteristics and quality parameters of grapes

Authors

  • Mersija DELIĆ University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Department of Viticulture and Enology, Zmaja od Bosne 8, 71000 (BA)
  • Anastasija ANĐUŠIĆ University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Department of Viticulture and Enology, Zmaja od Bosne 8, 71000 (BA)
  • Fahrudin TOPČIĆ University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Department of Viticulture and Enology, Zmaja od Bosne 8, 71000 (BA)
  • Milenko BLESIĆ University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Department of Viticulture and Enology, Zmaja od Bosne 8, 71000 (BA)
  • Fikreta BEHMEN University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Department of Fruit Growing, Zmaja od Bosne 8, 71000 Sarajevo (BA)
  • Mirela SMAJIĆ MURTIĆ University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Department of Viticulture and Enology, Zmaja od Bosne 8, 71000 (BA)
  • Senad MURTIĆ University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Department of Plant Physiology, Zmaja od Bosne 8, 71000 Sarajevo (BA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha53314607

Keywords:

berry traits, chemical parameters, cluster structure, grape quality

Abstract

Harvest timing is a critical factor in viticulture, as it directly influences grape composition and, consequently, wine quality. This study evaluated the effects of harvest timing on the physical and chemical traits of two widely cultivated grape varieties from the Trebinje vineyard area, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Basic chemical parameters (total soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity) were measured alongside cluster and berry traits, including length, width, and weight of clusters; the number and weight of berries; the skin and flesh weight of 100 berries; and the number and weigh of seeds. Early-harvested grapes showed greater cluster weight but lower total soluble solids, higher titratable acidity, and lower pH compared to later harvests in both cultivars. Changes in cluster and berry traits were more pronounced in ‘Vranac’, where berry weight, skin and flesh mass increased significantly at later harvests, however, in ‘Žilavka’ only the seed weight was notably affected. Across all harvests period, ‘Žilavka’ consistently exhibited higher total soluble solids and lower pH values than ‘Vranac’, indicating a strong varietal effect on grape quality. These findings highlight that delaying harvest within the recommended window can enhance grape composition, while varietal differences determine the extent of morphological and chemical changes during ripening.

References

AOAC (2000). Official method of analysis, Method No: 942.15. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (17th ed), Washington.

Atak A, Akgün M, Şen A, Göksel Z, Uzun A (2025). Evaluation of quality characteristics and cultivar candidate potentials of hybrid genotypes obtained from different Vitis species. Horticulturae 11(4):354. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11040354

Banjanin T, Ranković-Vasić Z, Glišić M, Pržić Z (2024). The observed changes in climate characteristics in the Trebinje vineyard area (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Atmosphere 15(4):514. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15040514

Banjanin T, Ranković-Vasić Z, Matijašević S (2018). Technological characteristics of the Vranac and Cabernet sauvignon grapevine varieties in the conditions of the Trebinje vineyards. Agro-Knowledge Journal 19(3):167-175. https://doi.org/10.7251/AGREN1803167B

Chen W-K, He F, Wang Y-X, Liu X, Duan C-Q, Wang J (2018). Influences of berry size on fruit composition and wine quality of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grapes. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 39(1):67-76. https://doi.org/10.21548/39-1-2439

Clarke SJ, Rogiers SY (2019). The role of fruit exposure in the late season decline of grape berry mesocarp cell vitality. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 135:69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.11.025

Crisosto CH, Campos-Vargas R, Lichter A (2020). Table grape. In Crisosto CH, Crisosto MG (Eds). Manual on postharvest handling of mediterranean tree fruits and nuts. Cabi, Boston, USA pp 184-221. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781789247176.0184

Doumouya S, Lahaye M, Maury C, Siret R (2014). Physical and physiological heterogeneity within the grape bunch: Impact on mechanical properties during maturation. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 65:170-178. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2014.13062

Gao X-T, Li H-Q, Wang Y, Peng W-T, Chen W, Cai X-D, … Wang J (2019). Influence of the harvest date on berry compositions and wine profiles of Vitis vinifera L. cv. ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ under a semiarid continental climate over two consecutive years. Food Chemistry 292:237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.070

Garcia-Hernandez C, Perez-Gonzalez C, Martin-Pedrosa F, Dias LG, Barajas-Tola E, Rodriguez-Mendez ML, Garcia-Cabezon C (2025). Looking for the optimal harvest time of red grapes with an enzymatic electrochemical multisensory system. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 19:101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101554

Guirao A, Valverde JM, Díaz-Mula HM, Valero D, Serrano M, Martínez-Romero D (2024). Role of pre-harvest sorbitol-calcium treatments in controlling berry drop in bagged table grapes of the “Doña María” variety. Horticulturae 10(7):698. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10070698

ISO (2003). Fruit and vegetable products - Determination of soluble solids - Refractometric method 2173:2003. International Organization for Standardization (2nd ed), Geneva, Switzerland.

Khalil U, Rajwana IA, Razzaq K, Mustafa G, Sarkhosh A (2024). Changes in physicochemical quality and antioxidant system of grapes by kaolin applied to reduce bunch compactness. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 100(3):396-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2024.2430181

Li M, Huang Z, You X, Zhang Y, Wei P, Zhou K, Wang Y (2020). Relationships between cell structure alterations and berry abscission in table grapes. Frontiers in Nutrition 7:69. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.00069

Lu L, Delrot S, Liang Z (2024). From acidity to sweetness: a comprehensive review of carbon accumulation in grape berries. Molecular Horticulture 4:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43897-024-00100-8

Maraš V, Popović T, Gazivoda A, Raičević J, Kodžulović V, Mugoša M, Šućur S (2015). Origin and characterization of Montenegrin grapevine varieties. Vitis 54:135-137. https://doi.org/10.5073/vitis.2015.54.special-issue.135-137

Melo MS, Schultz HR, Volschenk CG, Hunter JJ (2015). Berry size variation of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Syrah: Morphological dimensions, berry composition and wine quality. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 36(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.21548/36-1-931

Moradi S, Koushesh Saba M, Sadeghi S, Inglese P, Liguori G (2024). Changes in biochemical and bioactive compounds in two red grape cultivars during ripening and cold storage. Agronomy 14(3):487. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030487

Mucalo A, Maletić E, Zdunić G (2024). Positive impact of late harvest date on polyphenolic composition of Plavac mali (Vitis vinifera L.) wine depends on location. Foods 13(17):2695. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13172695

Nedomová Š, Kumbár V, Pavloušek P, Pytel R, Začal J, Buchar J (2016). Influence of harvest day on changes in mechanical properties of grape berries. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences 10(1):181-187. https://doi.org/10.5219/600

Nistor E, Dobrei A, Alda S, Danci M, Ciorica G, Dobrei A (2024). The impact of Merlot grapes harvesting time on berry composition. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology 28(1):41-49. https://jhfb.ro/index.php/jhfb/article/view/21

OIV (2009). International organisation of vine and wine: OIV descriptor list for grape varieties and vitis species (2nd edition). Paris, France. Retrieved 2025 May 20 from https://www.oiv.int

Pop A, Marc RA, Chircu C, Bobiș O, Marțiș GS, Salanța LC, Păucean A (2025). Factors impacting the composition of three grape varietal: Royal maiden, chardonnay, and pinot noir. Scientia Horticulturae 344:114098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114098

RHMS (2024). Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Republica Srpska. Documentation and Materials. Retrieved 2025 May 20 from http://rhmzrs.com/

Rolle L, Segade SR, Torchio F, Giacosa S, Cagnasso E, Marengo F, Gerbi V (2011). Influence of grape density and harvest date on changes in phenolic composition, phenol extractability indices, and instrumental texture properties during ripening. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59(16):8796-8805. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf201318x

Rotim N, Crnjac K (2023). ‘Žilavka’-autochthonous wine cultivar of Herzegovina. Glasnik Zaštite Bilja 46(6):86-94. https://doi.org/10.31727/gzb.46.6.9

Rouxinol MI, Martins MR, Barroso JM, Rato AE (2023). Wine grapes ripening: A review on climate effect and analytical approach to increase wine quality. Applied Biosciences 2(3):347-372. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci2030023

Škrab D, Sivilotti P, Comuzzo P, Voce S, Cisilino D, Carlin S, Arapitsas P, Masuero, D., Vrhovsek U (2024). Influence of harvest date on multi-targeted metabolomic profile and sensory attributes of Ribolla Gialla base and sparkling wines. OENO One 58(1). https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.1.7668

van Leeuwen C, Destrac Irvine A, Gowdy M, Farris L, Pieri P, Marolleau L, Gambetta G (2023). An operational model for capturing grape ripening dynamics to support harvest decisions. OENO One 57(2):505-522. https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.2.7399

Vool E, Rätsep R, Karp K (2015). Effect of genotype on grape quality parameters in cool climate conditions. Acta Horticulturae 1082:353-358. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1082.49

Wang H, Yao X, Liu M, Xu X, Wang Y, Kong J, … Dai Z (2025). Climate, soil, and viticultural factors differentially affect the sub-regional variations in biochemical compositions of grape berries. Scientia Horticulturae 339:113858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113858

Yuyuen P, Boonkerd N, Wanapu C (2015). Effect of grapes berry quality on wine quality. Suranaree Journal of Science and Techology 22(4):349-356. http://ird.sut.ac.th/e-journal/document/contents/Journal22(4)/Part%205.pdf

Zhao T, Wu J, Meng J, Shi P, Fang Y, Zhang Z, Sun X. (2019). Harvesting at the right time: Maturity and its effects on the aromatic characteristics of Cabernet Sauvignon wine. Molecules 24(15):2777. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24152777

Zhu M, Zheng L, Zeng Y, Yu J (2022). Susceptibility of two grape varieties to berry abscission. Scientia Horticulturae 304:111280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111280

Downloads

Published

2025-09-12

How to Cite

DELIĆ, M., ANĐUŠIĆ, A., TOPČIĆ, F., BLESIĆ, M., BEHMEN, F., SMAJIĆ MURTIĆ, M., & MURTIĆ, S. (2025). Optimizing harvest timing: Impacts on physical characteristics and quality parameters of grapes. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 53(3), 14607. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha53314607

Issue

Section

Research Articles
CITATION
DOI: 10.15835/nbha53314607