Effects of drip application of different concentrations of CO₂ solution on canopy gas exchange, growth, yield, and quality of cotton
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha53314538Keywords:
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), canopy gas exchange, CO₂ fertilization, drip irrigation, economic benefits, sustainable agriculture, yield and fibre qualityAbstract
Changes in atmospheric CO₂ concentration strongly affect the photosynthetic performance of C₃ plants. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), a major global cash crop, provides a suitable model to study CO₂ fertilization effects. While moderate CO₂ enrichment can promote growth and yield, the optimal regime for field-scale application remains unclear. In this study conducted in Xinjiang, China, CO₂ gas was dissolved in irrigation water at four concentrations (0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16 kg·m-³) and applied via a drip irrigation system. The effects on canopy CO₂ distribution, plant physiological responses, yield, and fibre quality were assessed. Drip-applied CO₂ solutions increased canopy CO₂ concentration by gradually releasing CO₂ from the soil, which in turn enhanced plant growth indicators (SPAD, AGB, LAI, plant height). Growth promotion followed a dose–response trend, with effects rising at lower concentrations and declining at higher levels. Yield analysis showed that lint yield increased by 1.9% and 8.4% under 0.04 and 0.08 kg·m-³ treatments, respectively, compared with the control (p < 0.05). In contrast, 0.12 and 0.16 kg·m-³ treatments reduced yield by 13.4% and 5.4%, respectively (p < 0.05). Fibre quality indicators remained within the optimal range across all treatments. Overall, 0.08 kg·m-³ was identified as the most effective concentration, producing the highest yield while maintaining fibre quality. These findings provide a scientific basis for the field application of CO₂-enriched irrigation, offering a promising approach to enhance cotton productivity and the ecological sustainability of farmland systems.
References
Araus JL, Sanchez-Bragado R, Vicente R (2021). Improving crop yield and resilience through optimization of photosynthesis: Panacea or pipe dream? Journal of Experimental Botany 72:3936-3955. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab097
Bailey-Serres J, Parker JE, Ainsworth EA, Oldroyd GED, Schroeder JI (2019). Genetic strategies for improving crop yields. Nature 575:109-118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1679-0
Brodrick R, Bange MP, Milroy SP, Hammer GL (2013). Physiological determinants of high yielding ultra-narrow row cotton: Canopy development and radiation use efficiency. Field Crops Research 148:86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.05.008
China Cotton Association (2024). The ninth session of the fourth council Xuhong Su: the development of Xinjiang cotton industry. Retrieved 2024 March 15 from https://www.china-cotton.org/app/html/2024/03/19/96757.html
Chen M, Liang F, Yan Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Tian J, … Zhang W (2021). Boll-leaf system gas exchange and its application in the analysis of cotton photosynthetic function. Photosynthesis Research 150:251-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00856-w
Chen Z, Niu Y, Zhao R, Han C, Han H, Luo H (2019). The combination of limited irrigation and high plant density optimizes canopy structure and improves the water use efficiency of cotton. Agricultural Water Management 218:139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.037
Chiba M, Terao T (2015). Open-top chambers with solar-heated air introduction tunnels for the high-temperature treatment of paddy fields. Plant Production Science 17:152-165. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.17.152
Constable GA, Bange MP (2015). The yield potential of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crops Research 182:98-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.017
Dabros A, Fyles JW, Strachan IB (2010). Effects of open-top chambers on physical properties of air and soil at post-disturbance sites in northwestern Quebec. Plant and Soil 333:203-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0336-z
Dai J, Li W, Tang W, Zhang D, Li Z, Lu H, … Dong H (2015). Manipulation of dry matter accumulation and partitioning with plant density in relation to yield stability of cotton under intensive management. Field Crops Research 180:207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.06.008
Dai J, Dong H (2014). Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: Achievements, challenges and countermeasures. Field Crops Research 155:99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.017
Drake BG, Gonzàlez-Meler MA, Long SP (1997). More efficient plants: A consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48:609-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.609
Engineer CB, Hashimoto-Sugimoto M, Negi J, Israelsson-Nordström M, Azoulay-Shemer T, Rappel W, … Schroeder J (2016). CO2 sensing and CO2 regulation of stomatal conductance: Advances and open questions. Trends in Plant Science 21:16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.08.014
Feng L, Wan S, Zhang Y, Dong H (2024). Xinjiang cotton: Achieving super-high yield through efficient utilization of light, heat, water, and fertilizer by three generations of cultivation technology systems. Field Crops Research 312:109401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109401
Fong BN, Reba ML, Teague TG, Runkle BRK, Suvočarev K (2020). Eddy covariance measurements of carbon dioxide and water fluxes in US mid-south cotton production. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 292:106813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106813
Hagedorn F, Spinnler D, Bundt M, Blaser P, Siegwolf R (2003). The input and fate of new C in two forest soils under elevated CO2. Global Change Biology 9:862-872. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00638.x
He W, Yoo G, Ryu Y (2021). Evaluation of effective quantum yields of photosystem II for CO2 leakage monitoring in carbon capture and storage sites. PeerJ 9:e10652. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10652
He Y, Siemens J, Amelung W, Goldbach H, Wassmann R, Alberto MCR, … Lehndorff E (2015). Carbon release from rice roots under paddy rice and maize–paddy rice cropping. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 210:15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.04.029
Jans Y, Bloh WV, Schaphoff S, Müller C (2021). Global cotton production under climate change - Implications for yield and water consumption. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 25:2027-2044. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2027-2021
Kaiser E, Morales A, Harbinson J, Kromdijk J, Heuvelink E, Marcelis LFM (2015). Dynamic photosynthesis in different environmental conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:2415-2426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru406
Khan N, Han Y, Xing F, Feng L, Wang Z, Wang G, … Li Y (2020). Plant density influences reproductive growth, lint yield and boll spatial distribution of cotton. Agronomy 10(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010014
Lawlor DW, Mitchell RAC (1991). The effects of increasing CO2 on crop photosynthesis and productivity: A review of field studies. Plant, Cell and Environment 14:807-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01444.x
Li N, Lin H, Wang T, Li Y, Liu Y, Chen X, Hu X (2020). Impact of climate change on cotton growth and yields in Xinjiang, China. Field Crops Research 247:107590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107590
Luo Q, Bange M, Johnston D, Braunack M (2015). Cotton crop water use and water use efficiency in a changing climate. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 202:126-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.006
Makino A, Mae T (1999). Photosynthesis and plant growth at elevated levels of CO2. Plant and Cell Physiology 40:999-1006. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029493
Manning DAC, Renforth P (2013). Passive sequestration of atmospheric CO2 through coupled plant-mineral reactions in urban soils. Environmental Science and Technology 47:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301250j
Miglietta F, Peressotti A, Vaccari FP, Zaldei A, DeAngelis P, Scarascia-Mugnozza G (2001). Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) of a poplar plantation: the POPFACE fumigation system. New Phytologist 150:465-476. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00115.x
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2023). Announcement of the national bureau of statistics on cotton production in 2023. Retrieved 2024 March 15 from https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202312/t20231225_1945745.html
Pabuayon ILB, Kelly BR, Mitchell-McCallister D, Coldren CL, Ritchie GL (2021). Cotton boll distribution: A review. Agronomy Journal 113:956-970. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20516
Reddy KR, Koti S, Davidonis GH, Reddy VR (2004). Interactive effects of carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition on cotton growth, development, yield, and fiber quality. Agronomy Journal 96:1148-1157. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.1148
Silvertooth JC, Norton ER, Brown PW (1996). Cotton growth and development patterns. Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report 370103:75-97. doi: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/210757
Stitt M (1991). Rising CO2 levels and their potential significance for carbon flow in photosynthetic cells. Plant, Cell and Environment 14:741-762. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01440.x
Sun J, Xia Z, He T, Dai W, Peng B, Liu J, … Bai E (2017). Ten years of elevated CO2 affects soil greenhouse gas fluxes in an open top chamber experiment. Plant and Soil 420:435-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3414-7
Tom-Dery D, Eller F, Jensen K, Reisdorff C (2018). Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and climate change on biomass and nutritive value of Kyasuwa. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 91:88-95. https://doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2018.091.012
Xu Z, Jiang Y, Zhou G (2015). Response and adaptation of photosynthesis, respiration, and antioxidant systems to elevated CO2 with environmental stress in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00701
Xue L, Ma J, Hu Q, Cheng M, Wen X, Wu N, … Ma J (2021). Identification of CO2 leakage from geological storage based on maize spectral characteristic indexes. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 112:103342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103342
Yang Y, Yang Y, Han S, Macadam I, Liu DL (2014). Prediction of cotton yield and water demand under climate change and future adaptation measures. Agricultural Water Management 144:42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.06.001
Yao H, Zhang Y, Yi X, Zhang X, Zhang W (2016). Cotton responds to different plant population densities by adjusting specific leaf area to optimize canopy photosynthetic use efficiency of light and nitrogen. Field Crops Research 188:10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.012
Zhang Q, Yang L, Xu Z, Zhang Y, Luo H, Wang J, Zhang W (2014). Effects of cotton field management practices on soil CO2 emission and C balance in an arid region of Northwest China. Journal of Arid Land 6:468-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-014-0003-y
Zhou Y, Li F, Xin Q, Li Y, Lin Z (2024). Historical variability of cotton yield and response to climate and agronomic management in Xinjiang, China. Science of the Total Environment 912:169327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169327
Zuo W, Wu B, Wang Y, Xu S, Chen, M., Liang F, … Zhang W (2024). Optimal row spacing configuration to improve cotton yield or quality is regulated by plant density and irrigation rate. Field Crops Research 305:109187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109187
Zuo W, Wu B, Wang Y, Xu S, Tian J, Jiu X, … Zhang W (2023). Optimal planting pattern of cotton is regulated by irrigation amount under mulch drip irrigation. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1158329. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1158329
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hong REN, Mi YANG, Yiru MA, Zilong ZHANG, Lucheng LIANG, Duoer MA, Yan WU, Ze ZHANG, Jiangli WANG

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License:

Open Access Journal:
The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restriction. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.









.png)






