Biomass, carbon sequestration, and physiological behaviours of Paulownia ‘Shan Tong’ plantation under a semi-arid bioclimate

Sondes FKIRI; Imen OUERGHUI; M. Taher ELAIEB; Samir GHANNEM; Adel DABOUSSI; Zouhair NASR

doi:10.15835/nbha53314415

Authors

Sondes FKIRI University of Carthage, National Research Institute of Rural Engineering, Water and Forests (INRGREF), Laboratory of Management and Valorization of Forest Resources (LR16INRGREF01), Ariana, 2080; University of Gafsa, Higher Institute of Social Sciences and Education of Gafsa (ISSSEG), Route de Tozeur, 2112 (TN)
Imen OUERGHUI University of Carthage, National Research Institute of Rural Engineering, Water and Forests (INRGREF), Laboratory of Management and Valorization of Forest Resources (LR16INRGREF01), Ariana, 2080 (TN)
M. Taher ELAIEB University of Carthage, National Research Institute of Rural Engineering, Water and Forests (INRGREF), Laboratory of Management and Valorization of Forest Resources (LR16INRGREF01), Ariana, 2080 (TN)
Samir GHANNEM University of Carthage, Faculty of Sciences of Bizerte, Life Sciences Department, Laboratory of Environment Biomonitoring, Zarzouna, 7021; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie (INRAT), Route de Tozeur, 2112, Gafsa (TN)
Adel DABOUSSI Tunisia Oxy Tree Company, El Fahs, 1140 (TN)
Zouhair NASR University of Carthage, National Research Institute of Rural Engineering, Water and Forests (INRGREF), Laboratory of Management and Valorization of Forest Resources (LR16INRGREF01), Ariana, 2080 (TN)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha53314415

Keywords:

biomass, carbon sequestration, hydraulic traits, net photosynthesis, Paulownia ‘Shan Tong’

Abstract

Paulownia is a forest species native to China and Korea, recently introduced to Tunisia for its valuable wood and forage potential. Few studies have been conducted on the response of this tree to water stress. In this context, a field experiment was carried out in the El Fahs delegation (Zaghouan governorate, Tunisia) to study the behaviour of Paulownia trees (‘Shan Tong’) subjected to three irrigation treatments (1/2, 1/7, and 1/21 days). The biomass allocation, carbon sequestration capacity, and physiological responses to water deficit were investigated. The results revealed that the majority of biomass (65%) was allocated to the stems, while the leaves and roots each accounted for approximately 36%, with roots contributing more than 34% of the total biomass, differing from previous reports. In terms of carbon sequestration, the species demonstrated a notable capacity, storing 42% in leaves, 38.57% in stems, and 38.86% in roots, highlighting its potential for reforestation and urban greening initiatives. Physiological analyses indicated significant decreases in water potential and relative water content under prolonged drought stress, with the most severe water deficit treatment (T1/21) showing water potential (Ψw) values as low as -9.2 MPa. The leaf morphology also adapted to water scarcity, with increased specific leaf area in drought treatments, up by 40% from T1/2 to T1/21. Despite a decline in gas exchange efficiency and stomatal conductance under water stress, water use efficiency improved, suggesting an adaptive response. Chlorophyll content and stomatal density were optimized under drought conditions, reinforcing the species’ ability to withstand prolonged water deficits. These findings suggest that ‘Shan Tong’ exhibits physiological plasticity, making it a promising species for cultivation in semi-arid regions, though further studies on its long-term growth and biomass production under extreme drought conditions are warranted.

References

Akter N, Brishty TA, Karim MA, Ahmed MJU, Islam MR (2023). Leaf water status and biochemical adjustments as a mechanism of drought tolerance in two contrasting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 45(3):50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-023-03530-x

Ammar H, Kholif AE, Missaoui M, Zoabi H, Ghzayel S, de Haro-Martí M, ... Chahine M (2023). Seasonal variation in chemical composition, ruminal fermentation, and biological characteristics of Paulownia ‘Shan Tong’: in vitro potential use by sheep and goats. Fermentation 9(3):210. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9030210

Baier C, Thevs N, Villwock D, Emileva B, Fischer S (2021). Water productivity of Paulownia tomentosa x fortunei (Shan Tong) in a plantation at Lake Issyk-Kul, Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia. Trees 35(5):1627-1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02141-8

Baker NR (2008). Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59:89-113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759

Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2006). Declining hydraulic efficiency as transpiring leaves dehydrate: two types of response. Plant, Cell & Environment 29(12):2205-2215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01594.x

Chavarria G, dos Santos HP (2012). Advances in Selected Plant Physiology Aspects. In: Montanaro G, Dichio B (Eds.). Plant water relations: absorption, transport and control mechanisms. IntechOpen pp 105-132. https://doi.org/10.5772/33478

Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology 30(3):239-264. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02076

Clarke JM, McCaig TN (1982). Excised-leaf water retention capability as an indicator of drought resistance of Triticum genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 62(3):571-578. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps82-086

Cornic G, Massacci A (1996). Leaf photosynthesis under stress. In: Baker NR (Ed). Photosynthesis and the environment. Springer, Dordrecht pp 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48135-9_14

Cristiano PM, Villa MD, De Diego MS, Lacoretz MV, Madanes N, Goldstein, G (2020). Carbon assimilation, water consumption and water use efficiency under different land use types in subtropical ecosystems: from native forests to pine plantations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 291:108094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108094

Da Silva Costa L (2024). Morphological, anatomical, and physiological investigation into the adaptive responses of Paulownia tomentosa to different abiotic stimuli. PhD Thesis. Universitaet Hamburg, Germany.

Dong Y, Fan G, Zhao Z, Deng M (2014). Transcriptome expression profiling in response to drought stress in Paulownia australis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15(3):4583-4607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15034583

Dubois G, Missaoui R, Caron JP, Cauchy A, Bethaouane MH, Bachta MS, Meddeb S, Nasr Z (2012). Stratégie nationale d’adaptation au changement climatique en Tunisie. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Eschborm, Germany p 167. www.giz.de

Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G, Sharkey TD (2004). Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C₃ plants. Plant Biology 6(3):269-279. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820867

Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C, Laurent G (2001). A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content. Functional Ecology 15(5):688-695. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00563.x

Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR (1989). The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 990(1):87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9

Gleason SM, Westoby M, Jansen S, Choat B, Hacke UG, Pratt RB, ... Zanne AE (2016). Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem‐specific hydraulic efficiency across the world's woody plant species. New Phytologist 209(1):123-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13646

Gratani L, Crescente MF, Varone L, Bonito A, Tinelli A (2015). Pinus pinea L. plant trait variations in response to tree age and silvicultural management and carbon storage capability. Rendiconti Lincei 26:507-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-014-0343-8

Haghpanah M, Hashemipetroudi S, Arzani A, Araniti F (2024). Drought Tolerance in plants: Physiological and molecular responses. Plants 13(21):2962. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13212962

Icka P, Damo R, Icka E (2016). Paulownia tomentosa, a fast growing timber. Annals of “Valahia” University of Targoviste 10(1):14-19.

IPCC (2006). Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrived 2007 April 01 from https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl

Jakubowski M (2022). Cultivation potential and uses of Paulownia wood: A review. Forests 13(5):668. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13050668

Johnson DW, Curtis PS (2001). Effects of forest management on soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) storage: A meta‑analysis. Forest Ecology and Management 140(2-3):227-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00282-6

Llano-Sotelo JM, Alcaraz-Melendez L, Castellanos Villegas AE (2010). Gas exchange in Paulownia species growing under different soil moisture conditions in the field. Journal of Environmental Biology 31(4):497-502.

Lozano-Elena F, Fàbregas N, Coleto-Alcudia V, Caño-Delgado AI (2022). Analysis of metabolic dynamics during drought stress in Arabidopsis plants. Scientific Data 9:90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01161-4

Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000). Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51(345):659-668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659

Miranda MT, Espinoza-Núñez E, Silva SF, Pereira L, Hayashi AH, Boscariol-Camargo RL, ... Ribeiro RV (2022). Water stress signaling and hydraulic traits in three congeneric citrus species under water deficit. Plant Science 319:111255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2022.111255

Muhammad I, Ullah F, Ahmad S, AlMunqedhi BM, Al Farraj DA, Elshikh MS, Shen W (2024). A meta-analysis of photosynthetic efficiency and stress mitigation by melatonin in enhancing wheat tolerance. BMC Plant Biology 24:427. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05132-2

Nicotra AB, Atkin OK, Bonser SP, Davidson AM, Finnegan EJ, Mathesius U, ... van Kleunen M (2010). Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science 15(12):684-692.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008

Peñuelas J, Sardans J, Filella I, Estiarte M, Llusià J, Ogaya R, … Terradas J (2017). Impacts of global change on Mediterranean forests and their services. Forests 8(12):463. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120463

Pirasteh‐Anosheh H, Saed‐Moucheshi A, Pakniyat H, Pessarakli M (2016). Stomatal responses to drought stress. In: Parvaiz A (Ed). Water stress and crop plants: A sustainable approach. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119054450

Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R (2009). Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): A meta‐analysis. New Phytologist 182(3):565-588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02830.x

Qiao M, Hong C, Jiao Y, Hou S, Gao H (2024). Impacts of drought on photosynthesis in major food crops and the related mechanisms of plant responses to drought. Plants 13(13):1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131808

Schlesinger WH (1997). Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change. Academic Press (2nd ed), San Diego, CA.

Serrano L, Peñuelas J (2005). Contribution of physiological and morphological adjustments to drought resistance in two Mediterranean tree species. Biologia Plantarum 49(4):551-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-0049-y

Sperry JS, Donnelly JR, Tyree MT (1988). A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem. Plant, Cell & Environment 11(1):35-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1988.tb01774.x

Sun Y, Wang C, Chen HY, Ruan H (2020). Response of plants to water stress: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:00978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00978

Szabó F, Rásó J, Ábri T, Juhász L, Rédei K (2022). Volume of Paulownia Shan Tong (Paulownia fortunei × Paulownia tomentosa) plantation in Eastern Hungary: a case study. Acta Agraria Debreceniensis 2:43-46. https://doi.org/10.34101/actaagrar/2/11336

Thevs N, Baier C, Aliev K (2021). Water productivity of poplar and paulownia on two sites in Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia. Journal of Water Resource and Protection 13(4):293-308. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2021.134018

Tyree MT, Sperry JS (1989). Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40:19-36. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.000315

Valladares F, Gianoli E, Gómez JM (2007). Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. New Phytologist 176(4):749-763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02275.x

Vicente-Serrano SM, Quiring SM, Peña-Gallardo M, Yuan S, Domínguez-Castro F (2020). A review of environmental droughts: Increased risk under global warming? Earth-Science Reviews 201:102953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102953

Wang J, Zhai J, Zhang J, Han X, Ge X, Si J, Li J, Li Z (2024). Leaf trait variations and ecological adaptation mechanisms of Populus euphratica at different developmental stages and canopy heights. Forests 15(8):1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15081283

Yan L, Li Y, Dong Y, Fan G (2019). Transcriptional and post transcriptional responses of diploid and autotetraploid Paulownia tomentosa × P. fortunei under water deficit conditions. Brazilian Journal of Botany 42:623-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-019-00566-7

Zhou S, Duursma RA, Medlyn BE, Kelly JW, Prentice IC (2013). How should we model plant responses to drought? An analysis of stomatal and non-stomatal responses to water stress. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 182-183:204-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.05.009

Zhuang J, Wang Y, Chi Y, Zhou L, Chen J, Zhou W, Song J, Zhao N, Ding J (2020). Drought stress strengthens the link between chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic traits. PeerJ 8:e10046. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10046