Spatial and temporal distribution of mung bean (Vigna radiata) and soybean (Glycine max) roots

  • Hang ZHOU Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, College of Agriculture, 5 Xinfeng road, Gaoxin district, Daqing, Heilongjiang (CN)
  • Dianfeng ZHENG Guangdong Ocean University, College of Agriculture, 1 Haida road, Mazhang district, Zhanjiang, Guangdong (CN)
  • Naijie Feng Guangdong Ocean University, College of Agriculture, 1 Haida road, Mazhang district, Zhanjiang, Guangdong; Shenzhen Institute of Guangdong Ocean University, 3 Binhaier Road, Dapeng New District, Shenzhen, Guangdong (CN)
Keywords: mung bean; root length; root surface area; root volume; root dry weight; soybean


Spatial and temporal distribution of roots of mung bean and soybean originated from different geographical backgrounds is an important scientific issue. The aim of this study was to research the spatial and temporal distribution of roots system of soybean cultivar ‘Hefeng55’ and mung bean cultivar ‘Jilv7’ which can elucidate differences between soybean roots and mung bean roots in the key spatial and temporal locations. The roots at V6, R2, R4, R5, R6, and R7 stages were collected to acquire data of root length, root surface area, root volume and root dry weight. 49.8%, 11.7%, 13.2%, 14.7% and 10.6% of soybean roots and 57.8%, 10.7%, 11.2%, 11.9% and 8.4% of mung bean roots were in 0-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20 and 20-25 cm horizontal soil layers, respectively; 79.2%, 11.5%, 4.3%, 1.8%, 1.1%, 1.0% and 1.1% of soybean roots and 70.0%, 12.3%, 8.0%, 3.0%, 1.6%, 1.7% and 3.4% of mung bean roots were in 0-20, 20-40, 40-60, 60-80, 80-100, 100-120 and 120-140 cm vertical soil layers, respectively. Compared with mung bean, soybean had a much larger root system during development. In horizontal direction, soybean root tended to be more laterally developed, but the distribution of mung bean root was more uniform in vertical direction. With a greater root surface area to weight ratio (AWR), mung bean had a finer root system than soybean. These findings can help to clarify the four-dimensional spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of legumes and may provide reference for production practice of soybean and mung bean in the future.


Metrics Loading ...


Adiku SG, Ozier-Lafontain H, Bajazet T (2001). Patterns of root growth and water uptake of a maize-cowpea mixture grown under greenhouse conditions. Plant and Soil 235:85-94.

Atta BM, Mahmood T, Trethowan TM (2013). Relationship between root morphology and grain yield of wheat in north-western NSW, Australia. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7:2108-2115.

Benjamin J, Nielsen DC (2006). Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea. Field Crop Research 97:248-253.

Calonego JC, Rosolem CA (2010). Soybean root growth and yield in rotation with cover crops under chiseling and no-till. European Journal of Agronomy 33:242-249.

Ehdaie B, Merhaut DJ, Ahmadian S, Hoops AC, Khuong T, Layne AP, Waines JG (2010). Root system size influences water-nutrient uptake and nitrate leaching potential in wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 196:455-466.

Eissenstat DM, Yanai RD (2002). Root life span, efficiency, and turnover. In Plant Roots, the Hidden Half. CRC Press, New York pp 221-238.

Fan J, McConkey B, Wang H, Janzen H (2016). Root distribution by depth for temperate agricultural crops. Field Crops Research 189:68-74.

Fang S, Gao X, Deng Y, Chen X, Liao H (2011). Crop root behaviour coordinates phosphorus status and neighbours: from field studies to three-dimensional in situ reconstruction of root system architecture. Plant Physiology 155:1277-1285.

Farmaha BS, Fernández FG, Nafziger ED (2012). Distribution of soybean roots, soil water, phosphorus and potassium concentrations with broadcast and subsurface-band fertilization. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76:1079-1089.

Gan Y, Campbell CA, Liu L, Basnyat P, Mcdonald CL (2009). Water use and distribution profile under pulse and oilseed crops in semiarid northern high latitude areas. Agricultural Water Management 96:337-348.

Gan Y, Liu L, Cutforth H, Wang X, Ford G (2011). Vertical distribution profiles and temporal growth patterns of roots in selected oilseeds, pulses and spring wheat. Crop and Pasture Science 62:457-466.

Gao Y, Duan A, Qiu X, Liu Z, Sun J, Zhang J, Wang H (2010). Distribution of roots and root length density in a maize/soybean strip intercropping system. Agricultural Water Management 98:199-212.

Liu L, Gan Y, Bueckert R, Van RK (2011). Rooting systems of oilseed and pulse crops. ii: vertical distribution patterns across the soil profile. Field Crops Research 122:248-255.

Logsdon SD, Reneau RB, Parker JC (1987). Corn seedling root growth as influenced by soil physical properties. Agronomy Journal 79:221-224.

Lynch J (1995). Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiology 109:7-13.

Mitchell RL, Russell WJ (1971). Root development and rooting patterns of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) evaluated under field conditions. Agronomy Journal 63:313-316.

Pedersen P, Kumudini S, Board J, Conley S (2004). Soybean growth and development. University Extension. Iowa State University.

Rao TP, Ito O (1998). Differences in root system morphology and root respiration in relation to nitrogen uptake among six crop species. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 32:97-103.

Vamerali T, Saccomani M, Bona S, Mosca G, Guarise M, Ganis A (2003). A comparison of root characteristics in relation to nutrient and water stress in two maize hybrids. Plant and Soil 255:157-167.

Waisel Y, Eshel A (2002). Functional diversity of various constituents of a single root system. In: Plant Roots CRC Press, New York pp 157-174.

Zhu J, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2010). Root cortical aerenchyma improves the drought tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant, Cell and Environment 33:740-749.

How to Cite
ZHOU, H., ZHENG, D., & Feng, N. (2020). Spatial and temporal distribution of mung bean (Vigna radiata) and soybean (Glycine max) roots . Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 48(4), 2263-2278.
Research Articles
DOI: 10.15835/nbha48411780