Effect of Grafting on Tomato Fruit Quality


  • Dorin SORA Research and Development Institute for Processing and Marketing of Horticultural Products – Horting, 5N Drumul Gilăului Street, District 4, 041715, Bucharest (RO)
  • Mădălina DOLTU Research and Development Institute for Processing and Marketing of Horticultural Products – Horting, 5N Drumul Gilăului Street, District 4, 041715, Bucharest (RO)
  • Elena Maria DRĂGHICI University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, Romania, 59 Mărăşti Boulevard, District 1, Bucharest 011464 (RO)
  • Marian I. BOGOESCU Research and Development Institute for Processing and Marketing of Horticultural Products – Horting, 5N Drumul Gilăului Street, District 4, 041715, Bucharest (RO)




carbohydrates; quality; rootstocks; soluble substance; tomatoes; vitamin C


The study aimed to assess if grafting affects tomato fruit quality. The research has been conducted in greenhouses where grafted and ungrafted tomatoes have been produced. A Romanian tomato hybrid and a Dutch tomato hybrid, ‘Siriana’ F1 and ‘Abellus’ F1, were used as scions and four cultivars of the Lycopersicon genus, ‘Emperador’ F1 (Dutch hybrid), ‘L542’, ‘L543’ and ‘L544’ (Romanian cultivars) were used as rootstocks. Eight grafted variants (‘Siriana’בEmperador’, ‘Siriana’בL542’, ‘Siriana’בL543’, ‘Siriana’בL544’, ‘Abellus’× ‘Emperador’, ‘Abellus’בL542’, ‘Abellus’בL543’, ‘Abellus’בL544’) and two ungrafted variants (‘Siriana’, control and ‘Abellus’, control) were obtained. The tomato fruit quality has been observed at ‘Siriana’ and ‘Abellus’ grafted on all rootstocks. Compared to ungrafted tomatoes, which have yielded 80.1% and 85.3% of extra and first quality fruits, ‘Siriana’ and ‘Abellus’ grafted on ‘Emperador’ have had a very good fruit quality, 82.3% and 86.8% and grafted on Romanian cultivars have had a quality between 79.1-79.8% and 84.1-84.4% to the same quality standards. Analyzing the dependence between the quality categories (extra and first class) and the soluble dry substance content, a positive dependence was observed between grafted plants and ungrafted plants at both hybrids, ‘Siriana’ r2 = 0.4914 and ‘Abellus’ r2 = 0.1517 and the carbohydrates content, a negative dependence was observed between grafted plants and ungrafted plants at both hybrids, ‘Siriana’ r2 = 0.017 and ‘Abellus’ r2 = 0.798. The total vitamin C content has decreased after grafting. The grafting has had an influence on the soluble dry substance content, the total amount of carbohydrates and vitamin C at all grafting combinations. It can be said that the rootstocks played an important role on the fruit quality.


Blestos FA, Olympos CM (2008). Rootstocks and grafting of tomatoes, peppers and eggplants for soil-borne disease resistance, improved yield and quality. The European Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 2(1):62-73.

Bogoescu M (2019). Grafting eggplant as a control method of soilborne pathogens and nematodes. Acta Horticulturae 1249:17-22.

Bogoescu M, Doltu M, Sora D, Mohora A, Iordache B (2009). Results on establishing the technology for obtaining the watermelons grafted seedlings. Bulletin UASVM Cluj-Napoca. Horticulture 66(1):397-403.

Davis AR, Perkins-Veazie P, Hassell R, King SR, Zhang X (2008). Grafting effects on vegetable quality. HortScience 43:1670-1672.

Doltu M, Bogoescu M, Sora D, Șovărel G (2017). Impact of some rootstocks on tomato production. Nano, bio, green and space - technologies for a sustainable. Advances in Biotechnology 17:251-256.

Ece A, Darakci N (2009). Effect of number of different stems on some fruit quality characteristics and yield in tomatoes (Lycopersicon lycopersicum L.). Journal of Applied Biological Sciences 3(2):175-178.

Erba D, Casiraghi MC, Ribas-Agustí A, Cáceres R, Marfà O, Castellari M (2013). Nutritional value of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) grown in greenhouse by different agronomic techniques. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 31(2):245-251.

Fernandez-Garci N, Martinez V, Cerda A, Carvajal M (2004). Fruit quality of grafted tomato plants grown under saline conditions. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 79(6):995-1001.

Flores FB, Sanchez-Bel P, Estan MT, Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Moyano E, Morales B, … Bolarin MC (2010). The effectiveness of grafting to improve tomato fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae 125:211-217.

Grieneisen ML, Aegerter BJ, Stoddard CS, Zhang M (2018). Yield and fruit quality of grafted tomatoes, and their potential for soil fumigant use reduction. A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38(3):1-16.

Hoza G, Doltu M, Dinu M, Becherescu AD, Apahidean AI, Bogoescu MI (2017). Response of different grafted eggplants in protected culture. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 45(2):473-480.

Huitrón-Ramírez MV, Ricárdez-Salinas M, Camacho-Ferre F (2009). Influence of grafted watermelon plant density on yield and quality in soil infested with melon necrotic spot virus. HortScience 44(7):1838-1841.

Kader AA (2008). Flavor quality of fruits and vegetables. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88:1863-1868.

Kyriacou MC, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Zrenner R, Schwarz D (2017). Vegetable grafting: The implications of a growing agronomic imperative for vegetable fruit quality and nutritive value. Frontiers in Plant Science 8(741):1-23.

Lagunovschi-Luchian V, Vînătoru C (2016). Legumicultură. Ed. Alpha MDN.

Maršić NK, Osvald J (2004). The influence of grafting on yield of two tomato cultivars (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in a plastic house. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 83(2):243-249.

Moreno MM, Villena J, González-Mora S, Moreno C (2019). Response of healthy local tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) populations to grafting in organic farming. Scientific Reports 9(1):4592.

Mourao I, Brito ML, Moura L, Ferreira EM, Costa RS (2017). The effect of pruning systems on yield and fruit quality of grafted tomato. Horticultura Brasileira 35(2):247-251.

Rouphael Y, Schwarz D, Krumbein A, Colla G (2010). Impact of grafting on product quality of fruit vegetables. Scientia Horticulturae 127(2):172-179.

Savvas D, Savva A, Ntatsi G, Ropokis A, Karapanos I, Krumbein A, Olympios C (2011). Effects of three commercial rootstocks on mineral nutrition, fruit yield and quality in salinised tomatoes. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 174(1):154-162.

Schwarz D, Öztekin GB, Tüzel Y, Brückner B, Krumbein A (2013). Rootstocks can enhance tomato growth and quality characteristics at low potassium supply. Scientia Horticulturae 149:70-79.

Turhan A, Ozmen N, Serbeci MS, Seniz V (2011). Effects of grafting on different rootstocks on tomato fruit yield and quality. Horticultural Science 38(4):142-149.

Vinkovic Vrcek I, Samobor V, Bojic M, Medic-Saric M, Vukobratovic M, Erhatic R, … Matotan Z (2011). The effect of grafting on the antioxidant properties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 9(3):844-851.




How to Cite

SORA, D., DOLTU, M., DRĂGHICI, E. M., & BOGOESCU, M. I. (2019). Effect of Grafting on Tomato Fruit Quality. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 47(4), 1246–1251. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47411719



Research Articles
DOI: 10.15835/nbha47411719